Product Spotlight MOBILE ORDERING APP!Featured Research Featured Research Convenience Store News - June 2017 Quick Stats Quick Stats You are here Former CVS Cigarette Buyers Speak Up in New Survey Many now make their purchases at gas stations.MIAMI — Since the CVS/pharmacy drugstore chain stopped selling tobacco products, gas stations have become the No.1 tobacco purchasing destination for former CVS tobacco customers, according to a commissioned study released by electronic cigarette and vaporizer manufacturer V2.The study, fielded Feb.8-12, surveyed 300 smokers who previously purchased cigarettes from a CVS location before the company's fall 2014 decision to exit the tobacco business.According to the findings, 39 percent are now buying cigarettes at gas stations.Finishing in a second-place tie were Walmart and Walgreens, at 20 percent each.7-Eleven convenience stores, which was categorized separately from gas stations, finished in a third-place tie with a “local store (not part of a chain),” both at 8 percent.

Meanwhile, 7 percent of the respondents said they now purchase cigarettes at dollar stores, while 3 percent buy tobacco products at Rite Aid drugstores.“Gas stations, in our survey, covers a wide range of c-store retailers and brick-and-mortar brands,” said Adam Kustin, vice president of marketing at V2.“It’s no secret that most cigarettes are sold in this channel.With CVS halting its sales, c-stores are getting additional customers.Another factor to consider is that gas prices across the country are at a 10-year low, meaning stations are seeing more business and transaction volume, with cigarette sales getting a boost secondarily.” Despite finding other outlets for their tobacco purchases, 52 percent of respondents said CVS’ decision to cease cigarette sales has impacted their ability to purchase cigarettes regularly.Among this group, 27 percent responded that buying cigarettes is “much harder” now, while 73 percent called the impact manageable and stated that “buying cigarettes is now harder, but I have other options.” The other 48 percent of those surveyed said CVS' decision had little impact on their cigarette purchases.

When asked their opinion on CVS' decision, one-third said they disagree with the move, while one-quarter said they agree.e cigarette shop near my locationHowever, the highest percentage are on the fence; 43 percent said they're neutral on the decision.vape shop 24 hoursFor those who disagree with CVS' move, a significant majority do so because they believe cigarettes were being unfairly targeted by CVS.e cigarette shop parisEighty-three percent agreed with the statement: “CVS sells other products — like alcohol and candy — that are bad for you and cigarettes shouldn’t be singled out.” For those who agree with CVS’ decision, 60 percent said CVS sells health products and thus cigarette sales simply “didn’t make sense.” Another 36 percent said they thought the move “could help to reduce cigarette smoking” more broadly.vaporizer as humidifier

Miami-based V2 is a division of VMR Products.bho vaporizer volcanoMy wife and I are very conscious of electricity usage, constantly reminding one another when we forget to turn things off.vaporizer dunedinWe don't tend to use a lot of lighting anyway; you won't find our home brightly lit up at night.Part of our diligence comes from the cost of electricity: we pay at least15 cents per Kilowatt hour here and that does encourage us to pay attention.But it is more than that: wasting anything offends us on some level.We aren't overly zealous - we don't think of providing convenience to ourselves as "waste", but we do tend to think about our power usage always.Thought doesn't always lead to action, though: I have often thought that we have a bit too much "convenience" and could do quite a bit better in our efforts.Not that we do so badly: our usage for the last twelve months has been 7,161 kWh, below U.S.

averages, but not so far below that we could not do better.During the winter months, part of our electrical usage comes from trying to keep our home at a comfortable level of humidity.VaporizorsWe've done that with humidifiers, which just blow room air through some sort of wet filter.The problem with these is that mold builds up very quickly.The more modern units are treated with all sorts of antibacterial coatings, but the mold still finds a way and, sooner or later, you will be breathing it.A simple solution is to use a steam vaporizer instead.Look at this photo.That's a modern humidifier filter after just a few days of use.Worse, it's after having just been cleaned with vinegar.See that discolored area at the top?That just gets worse over time.Yes, I'm sure that some of it may be from minerals in the water, but I'm equally sure that most of it is mold.You can smell it after a few days, and cleaning with vinegar doesn't really help (and uses a lot of vinegar).The filters aren't cheap, either.

This particular brand runs about $20.00 per filter and they definitely need replacing at least every three months.If cost were no object, I'd replace them once a week!The humidifier does prevent us from waking up with dry and cracked tongues, but it is expensive, inconvenient and the mold could be dangerous.Obviously a steam vaporizer like the inexpensive Vick's units is better.These actually boil water and there is no filter.All you need do is clean out the bowl regularly and soak the unit itself in vinegar (using far less vinegar than I would use for the humidifier!).However, the vaporizer obviously costs more to run.These things can draw over 600 watts!That's not necessarily the whole story, though.It takes more power to boil cold water than hot and the water in the vaporizer bowl obviously does heat up.How much power do these things actually consume overnight?I did not know.Measuring PowerIt was with all that in mind that I bought a Kill-A-Watt P4400 power meter.I bought the cheap model: all the more expensive models offer is a way to input your electricity rates so that the display can show you dollars used rather than Kilowatt hours.

I can multiply , so saw no need for that frill.Another even more expensive unit displays graphs of usage; while that might be quite handy in some situations, I didn't need that for my purpose.So, I bought the cheap version for $20.00.The Good and the BadI am not the first person to complain that the design of this meter leaves much to be desired.It is bulky and tends to hog an electrical outlet to itself.There is a fairly easy solution: plug it into a power strip as I've shown here.That can also help solve the problem of a hard to read display.In normal light, you really need to have a straight-on, direct view of the output display.No doubt that is on purpose: a backlit display would add cost and more power consumption for the unit itself.Putting it on a power strip lets you get it out where it is easier to see.That pictures shows my cell phone recharging - it starts out drawing 5 watts, but as the battery charge increases, the power drops.Here, just before the end of the cycle, it is under 1 watt.

Grip of DeathI haven't seen anyone else complain about this, but my unit is exceptionally difficult to unplug anything you have previously plugged in.It doesn't seem to take any unusual effort to plug into its outlet, but once in, the Kill-A-Watt seems very reluctant to let go.I don't think my wife would be able to unplug anything at all; even I often had to struggle and rock the plug from side to side to extract it.The HumidifierI measured the humidifier fan as drawing 60 watts.That won't change - if we run it for eight hours, it will pull nearly half a Killowatt hour.Of course, that doesn't reflect its true operating cost: those filters are expensive and we were using a fair amount of vinegar to clean it.How do we put a price on the mold?The VaporizerWhen first plugged in, the vaporizer drew almost 700 watts.However, as the water in the bowl warmed, that quickly started to drop and by the end of an hour, it was close to 300 watts.That's still a net difference of 240 watts, so if run for eight hours, the vaporizer costs approximately 28 cents more to run (based on our approximate 15 cents per kWH costs).

When I actually measured it overnight, it used 2.85 KW, which is a bit higher than my estimate.Still, it's not much.Comparing CostsIf we divide $20 (the cost of the humidifier filter) by 28 cents (the net difference in 8 hours of overnight use), we get 71 days of usage to break even.Our heating season runs a bit longer than that, but overall it looks like using the mold free vaporizer will only cost a few dollars more than the humidifier and is much easier to maintain.Free Electric Meters?Our local library has these meters available to check out.I prefer to own as I often wonder about the costs of various things.For example, my wife had bought the twig lights similar to those shown to the right.I noticed that the power adapter it uses became quite warm, so I suspected it was actually using up quite a bit of power to drive those LED lights.The Kill-A-Watt confirmed my suspicions - this thing draws 40 watts.That's not horrible, but it is more than you might have expected.Permawick FilterIn fairness, the most recent humidifier we used had a "Permawick" filter.

This still has to be cleaned with vinegar to remove mineral buildup.It is coated with some anti-microbial material to inhibit mold, but "inhibit" still makes me suspicious that mold will grow here.If not, it would make more economic sense to buy the much more expensive humidifier with the Permawick filter.I'd want to clean that daily, which is a fair amount of vinegar and a fair amount of time.The cost difference would repay itself in just a few months, but.. I'll do the steam Let's just forget operating cost comparisons: for 30 cents a night or less, I'd rather use the steam vaporizer and know that I'm not breathing mold.If it breaks, I can replace it for about $15.00 and can find it in most local stores easily.Maintenance is simple: I dump out the tub and dry it with paper towels.Once a week, I soak the steamer unit for ten minutes in vinegar and use a little bleach to clean out the bowl.That's much less work than the humidifier.By the way, if you are using this in winter as we do, don't be in a hurry to dump out that bowl in the morning.

You paid to heat that water, don't rush to dump it down the drain.Take out the steaming part and let the bowl sit for a while to put the heat into the room.I know it doesn't seem like much, but if you dump warm water, that really is just throwing away money.It may be only a few pennies, but would you get up every morning and toss your pocket change into the garbage?The TVsThese "instant on" TVs draw power when they are off.So do the cable boxes that feed them.The smaller one in our bedroom is almost 20 watts.No, that's hardly a fortune in electricity, but the bigger one is almost 40 watts, so that's like a 60 watt bulb burning night and day, whether we are watching TV or not.At one time we had four TVs and four cable boxes.That was 100 watts or more.I cut them off at the source.With one, I was lucky enough to have a wall switch that controlled a wall outlet near the TV.I suppose the idea was to turn on a lamp, but I plugged an extension bar into that and plugged everything else into the bar.