If you’ve experienced congestion, and we all have, you know it’s not only a miserable feeling, but it also, mechanically, can be difficult to breathe.Regular lung cleansing may just be the answer to many respiratory ailments.We’re always breathing so, unlike some conditions, which may be easy to temporarily ignore, clogged sinuses and lung congestion are a constant and literal in-your-face malady that can make every second miserable.When congestion or upper respiratory irritation happens, most of us long for days prior when easy breathing wasn’t even a thought.Fortunately, menthol crystals can help provide that relief as studies have demonstrated that menthol reduces bronchoconstriction and airway hyper responsiveness.Often found in mouthwashes, toothpaste, balms, and a host of other products, menthol is the primary active ingredient in essential oil of peppermint that provides the familiar cooling sensation and minty odor and taste.Menthol crystals are produced by rapidly cooling the essential oil of peppermint.

Menthol crystals are very concentrated and beneficial if added to a lung cleansing formula in small amounts.Lung cleansing products that contain menthol crystals can provide tremendous relief for symptoms of congestion, upper respiratory problems, sore throat and coughs.In fact, most lozenges, cough drops, and respiratory balms will list menthol as the chief ingredient.It’s no surprise, if you’re congested and start inhaling the scent of menthol crystals, you can almost feel the menthol vapors attacking and breaking up lung congestion.The cooling and soothing sensation can be very relieving.Although many ready-to-use lung cleansing products such as Allertrex® contain menthol crystals, they’re also easy to use in several at-home remedies.Adding menthol crystals to hot water and inhaling the vapors can begin to soothe congestion and irritated nasal or throat passages.Before getting in the shower, try dissolving some menthol crystals in a little water and add a few drops to the shower walls.

The steam will release the menthol and provide you with an invigorating shower that provides aroma therapeutic benefits.aksesoris vaporizer di bandungAn article in Professional Care of Mother and Child noted that menthol can be extremely effective for blocked nasal passages.vaporizer prices south africaFurthermore, when used to relieve cough symptoms, menthol, unlike other cough suppressant formulas, does not contain antihistamines, which often result in drowsiness.vaporizer annandale[1] A separate article in the same publication cited menthol as an effective remedy for nasal congestion.volcano vaporizer base

[2] A study by the Department of Respiratory Medicine at the Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine in Japan found that menthol was very beneficial for respiratory symptoms because of its ability to inhibit airway smooth muscle contraction.bic vaporizer[3] In a related vein, research conducted by the Monell Chemical Senses Center and published in Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics found that inhaling menthol vapors significantly decreases coughing.bisnis vaporizerThe tendency of menthol to reduce the cough reflex explains why menthol alone is an active ingredient in many respiratory therapeutic products and may be almost as effective as pharmaceutical products with drugs added.Unfortunately, the reduction in airway sensitivity may also explain the questionable practice of some cigarette manufacturers to add menthol to their products.

[4] The Common Cold and Nasal Research Centre in the United Kingdom published an article in the May, 2003 edition of Current Allergy and Asthma Reports that said, “With the recent discovery of a menthol receptor on the sensory nerves that modulate the cool sensation, menthol has graduated from the realms of herbal medicine into the field of molecular pharmacology.” [5] If you suffer from symptoms of respiratory ailments, or would like to cleanse your lungs on a regular basis, try a lung cleansing formula such as Allertrex®.Information and statements made are for education purposes and are not intended to replace the advice of your doctor.Global Healing Center does not dispense medical advice, prescribe, or diagnose illness.The views and nutritional advice expressed by Global Healing Center are not intended to be a substitute for conventional medical service.If you have a severe medical condition or health concern, see your physician.Black Note has recently published two posts looking at the issue of diacetyl in e-cigarettes, with one covering the science behind the debate and the other focusing more on the disagreement on the issue within the vaping community.

The posts are both well-worth reading – so go take a look if you want the full story – but we’ve condensed some of the key take-away points here.If you think you never vape diacetyl-containing juices, you’re probably wrong.If you love sweet-flavored juices – like most vapers do – then you’ll almost certainly be consuming some diacetyl.In Dr. Farsalinos’ February 2015 study of diacetyl in e-juice, about three-quarters of the sweet-flavored juices tested contained them.This brought the issue to the attention to more of the vaping community, but when the recent Harvard study came out in late 2015, around the same proportion of tested flavors contained it.More and more vendors may be ditching diacetyl, especially since the latest study weas released, but to pretend it’s dropped below 50 percent of eligible juices would just be wishful thinking.Most vapers will undoubtedly already be aware of this, but diacetyl is present in cigarette smoke, and the levels of diacetyl there are actually much higher than in e-juice.

This point was widely missed (or, probably more accurately, ignored) by journalists reporting on the latest study, but it’s absolutely crucial: you’re still reducing your risks if you vape diacetyl-containing e-liquid.One of the most widely-cited figures by those pointing out the higher levels of diacetyl in cigarette smoke was that smokers consume 750 times more diacetyl than vapers.As the figure got passed around, it was increasingly implied that smoke contains 750 times more diacetyl than vapor.The reality, though, is that the figure was calculated by Michael Siegel based on a day of vaping vs.a day of smoking.The big limitation is that it’s based on a consumption of 1 ml of e-liquid per day.This is a big underestimate for most vapers.Using an assumption of 5 ml per day, it would be more like 150 times less per day.The previous point is often followed up by the observation that smokers don’t even get popcorn lung, and this seems like a devastating argument.Surely diacetyl in e-cig vapor isn’t anything to worry about, then?

As Dr. Farsalinos points out in the article: We have addressed this issue in our paper on diacetyl which was published in September 2014.We should not forget that cigarette smoke contains not only diacetyl (at high levels) but also many more respiratory toxins.The combined exposure to these toxins can lead to a different form of respiratory disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.Also, it is important to stress that Chronic Obstructive Lung disease is much more common in smokers compared to popcorn lung disease in those exposed to diacetyl in the occupational setting.As tiresome as it is to hear, time and time again, how we “just don’t know enough” about the potential risks of vaping, it’s very much the case when it comes to diacetyl in e-juice.As Carl V. Phillips points out in his post about the issue, the available evidence (although it all points in the same direction), tends to involve exposures to multiple chemicals at much higher levels than in e-juice.He says that any estimates of the risks for vapers involve “heroic guesses.” Many agree with Dr. Farsalinos’ point that diacetyl is an “avoidable risk” for vapers, but it’s important to remember that we don’t definitely know whether there will be a risk to vapers.

Despite the uncertainty stemming from the limitations of the currently available evidence, the data we do have suggests that the amounts of diacetyl detected in e-juice aren’t a cause for major panic.The evidence from factories – where workers are exposed to cocktails of chemicals – generally found reduced lung function and not much else.The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health sets workplace limits for diacetyl based on the amount that would lead to a 1/1000 chance of developing airway obstruction after 45 years of exposure.Many e-juices would expose vapers to more than this limit, but it’s clear that the risks are still fairly remote, and pale in comparison to those of smoking.Acetyl propionyl and acetoin are two chemicals commonly used as a replacement for diacetyl, but whether they’re safer alternatives is up for debate.For acetyl propionyl in particular, there is evidence that it’s just as bad as diacetyl, although we don’t have any data outside of lab studies on rats and mice, which is very difficult to apply to humans.

For acetoin, the evidence so far doesn’t suggest a risk for inhalation.In the article, they speak to several prominent vapers (including Grimm Green, Russ Wishtart of Click, Bang!, James Dunworth from E-Cigarette Direct, Morton Moe of the Vaping Giraffe and others), and there is broad agreement that what’s needed from the industry is transparency.We can accept the uncertain risks of diacetyl – the fact that we vape at all means that we’re fairly happy with uncertain risks – but we should be informed that we’ll be taking these risks.If vendors tell us if their juices contain diacetyl, then we can decide for ourselves whether we mind inhaling it.Pretending your juice doesn’t contain it but then being found to use it is a guaranteed way to annoy vapers (as Five Pawns will undoubtedly have realized).The good news for the industry is that many companies clearly do value transparency, and have either opted to remove diacetyl from their juices or have published full test results showing whether their juices have diacetyl, and if they do, how much there is.

Companies involved with the post like Black Note, E-Cigarette Direct’s Halo brand, Mt.Baker Vapor and NamberJuice, as well as vendors such as Vapor Shark have either removed diacetyl or made test results widely available.Finally, if you’re looking for diacetyl-free e-liquid, there’s only one way you can be sure you’re getting it: check out the lab report.Previous instances of companies claiming to be diacetyl-free but actually not being should have tipped you off: only hard evidence will do; not weak promises.So diacetyl probably isn’t a killer lurking in your e-juice – and we might not really be that sure how bad the levels in e-juice are likely to be – but the issue is important, nonetheless.The reason is simple, and something that doesn’t really bode too well for the industry: companies had the opportunity to remove diacetyl or at least be up-front about it for the past couple of years (if not more), but it is still an issue with many brands of juice.We need to praise those who are doing things right – and vote with our wallets by buying juice from them – but more importantly, put pressure on those who really are making the industry look like it’s the Wild West.